Back to all articles
Benchmarks 8 min readMarch 27, 2025

Amazon Nova Micro vs Claude Haiku for RAG: Cost and Latency Benchmarks

We ran 10,000 queries through both models on identical RAG tasks. Nova Micro wins on price/latency for short-context answers. Full benchmark data included.

Bedrock Nova Claude Cost

The Race to the Bottom in LLM Pricing

In a SaaS environment, token costs dictate your profit margin. For standard RAG applications (extracting information from 5-10 paragraphs of text), running massive models like Claude 3.5 Sonnet or GPT-4o is severe overkill and ruins unit economics.

The Challenger: Amazon Nova Micro

Amazon recently unveiled their internally trained Nova models. For VegaRAG, we benchmarked Nova Micro against Anthropic's Claude 3 Haiku—both managed via AWS Bedrock.

Latency

Time-to-first-token (TTFT) is critical for streaming chat experiences. Nova Micro consistently hit ~350ms TTFT in our us-east-1 deployments, while Haiku hovered around 500ms. When generating shorter 150-word summaries, Nova Micro streamed out its entire completion within 1.2 seconds, dominating Haiku by 30%.

Accuracy on RAG

Testing against a standard "Needle in a Haystack" prompt with 4,000 tokens of injected context from PDF extractions, both models flawlessly answered binary and extraction queries. However, Haiku was slightly better at nuanced tone translation. Since VegaRAG prioritizes strict factual extraction from uploaded data, Nova Micro's capabilities were indistinguishable from Haiku's for our specific use case.

Unit Economics

Nova Micro pricing drastically undercuts the competition. When serving thousands of agents, switching the backend to Amazon Nova immediately slashed our monthly Bedrock token bill by over 45% without degrading client satisfaction.

Build exactly what you just read.

VegaRAG is entirely open-source and ready for production on AWS.